Integrated Planning in a COIL Framework Summary of a Course Guide

This summary outlines recommendations for enhancing a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) course on Integrated Planning, taking into account the experience acquired through the pilot application of the COIL designed during the implementation of InPlanEd Research Project. This guide is focusing on three interrelated dimensions: A. the development of the content, B. groupwork dynamics, and C. practical delivery. More specific:

 

1.   Content Considerations

Content considerations are the most important for developing a successful COIL course on integrated planning, as it is a wide academic field. Some points in which it should be paid attention are the ones bellow:

• One of the key opportunities for enhancing the pedagogical coherence of the course lies in the integration of a unifying narrative thread that systematically links the various components, including guest lectures, seminars, and collaborative assignments. This is crucial in any course; much more so in the COIL case that students do not have an interpersonal contact from its beginning and are not familiar with all the topics examined within the course. Although, this structural characteristic was pursued to be implemented during the pilot application, the COIL structure was perceived as somewhat fragmented, as a wide variety of topics was aimed to be covered. To address this, it is advisable to structure the course around a central, thematic framework that serves as an intellectual and practical anchor throughout the duration of the program. By embedding each session within this overarching storyline, students are more likely to engage deeply with the material, as they can situate new knowledge within a clearly defined context. Moreover, such narrative alignment fosters cumulative learning, encourages interdisciplinary synthesis, and reinforces the applied nature of the course. This approach not only enhances content retention but also cultivates a stronger sense of purpose and direction among participants, ultimately enriching their educational experience.

• Building upon this narrative framework, the course should adopt a horizontally integrated structure in which the weekly theoretical content is explicitly aligned with the progressive stages of the final group assignment. This alignment ensures that each lecture (or group activity implemented) plays a clearly defined role within the overall course trajectory, reinforcing the continuity of learning. Such an approach not only facilitates incremental skill-building but also supports a more meaningful synthesis of theory and practice. Students are encouraged to view each lecture as a building block in the development of a comprehensive urban plan, rather than as an isolated academic exercise. At the same time, incorporating a brief reflective task or formative assessment at the conclusion of each session serves to consolidate newly acquired knowledge and provide opportunities for self-evaluation. These tasks can also serve as valuable feedback mechanisms for instructors, offering insight into student comprehension and enabling timely pedagogical adjustments. Collectively, these strategies promote a cohesive and purposeful learning environment, aligned with both academic objectives and real-world application.

• Engaging students meaningfully in a COIL course is quite important for its success. It requires clearly establishing the purpose and relevance of working across institutional and national boundaries, although students may claim that they clearly understand it. Participants may initially question the rationale for partnering with a university in another country. To address this, it is important to communicate, at an early stage, the common urban challenges faced in both contexts, like urban sprawl, climate resilience, or the impacts of tourism. Emphasis should be put in the thematic area(s) in which the course will focus on. In that way, the course it would be understood as an opportunity for comparative analysis that allow students to recognize the broader significance of their work and the value of diverse perspectives. 

• To further enhance the importance of studying in a COIL mode and encourage students to feel satisfied by choosing such a course type, any in-person engagement -such as an international week- should be deliberately integrated into the course structure as a strategically timed and pedagogically purposeful event. Rather than serving as a standalone experience, this physical meeting point should function as a milestone within the broader learning trajectory. It may, for example, mark a checkpoint for the development of group projects, facilitate collaborative design workshops, or culminate in a public presentation of interim findings. Such structured encounters not only enrich the intercultural and experiential dimensions of the course but also strengthen student accountability and reinforce the practical relevance of their collaborative efforts. 

• Finally, it is essential to build in opportunities for ongoing dialogue with both students and co-instructorsregarding the course structure. Periodic check-ins and feedback sessions can foster a shared sense of agency and ensure that the course evolves in response to participant needs.

 

 

2.   Groupwork Considerations

Apart from the groupwork thematic area, that should be related to the lectures -as noted in the previous section-, it is crucial for a COIL course developers in the field of integrated planning to pay attention to the points bellow:

• Due to the interdisciplinary nature of the course and the variety of the students’ status and background, it is important to bridge the knowledge gaps by organizing supplementary workshops or providing students with support materials tailored to each cohort’s needs. This observation came to the fore during the pilot application, as UCY students struggled with spatial analysis methods such as space syntax, while NTUA students encountered difficulties with advanced computational and urban analytics components

• Group composition must be approached with careful attention to balance differentions—not only in terms of the number of participants from each institution but also in relation to their academic backgrounds and skillsets. Effective collaboration relies on heterogeneous teams where disciplinary differences are leveraged rather than allowed to create imbalance.

• Flexibility should characterize group-based assignments. This flexibility should enable students to engage with components of the project that correspond to their specific academic or professional interests, thereby allowing them to apply and further develop their disciplinary expertise within the broader collaborative framework. At the same time, such individual contributions must remain aligned with the overall objectives of the group project, ensuring that each student’s work not only reflects their personal academic trajectory but also adds substantive value to the collective outcome. This approach supports deeper engagement, fosters disciplinary integration, and accommodates the diverse educational backgrounds that often characterise international, interdisciplinary learning environments.

​

3.    Practical Considerations

Finally, organizers of a COIL on integrated planning should take into account some practical issues:

• The course should primarily be conducted online. However, synchronous lectures should be minimized in favor of asynchronous content, interactive forums, and collaborative digital platforms. This model supports flexibility across time zones and allows deeper engagement with course material.

• To cultivate genuine intercultural exchange and deepen interpersonal learning, structured time should be reserved for students to engage in paired (or small groups) discussions. These dialogues should be embedded within the course timeline, ideally linked to project milestones or weekly reflection tasks, ensuring that students engage not only across disciplinary lines but across cultures and personal perspectives.

• An international, face-to-face component—preferably in the form of an “International Week”, as previously mentioned—remains an important pedagogical asset. During this meeting, a single, site-specific case study about the host-city should be used as the main learning tool. To conduct this case study, on-site visits and expert engagement are going to take place; thus, real-world context can provide invaluable experiential learning opportunities.

 

      Final Thoughts 

Through a more intentional design, rooted in narrative cohesion, practical application, and pedagogical inclusivity, a COIL course focusing on Integrated Planning holds the potential to evolve into a truly transformative educational experience. By aligning content with a unifying thematic framework, embedding weekly learning within a coherent project-based trajectory, and facilitating continuous engagement across diverse academic and cultural perspectives, the course can move beyond traditional educational modes. It becomes a dynamic platform where students are not only exposed to the complexities of integrated urban planning, but also actively participate in constructing knowledge through cross-border collaboration.

Moreover, by incorporating reflective practices, meaningful face-to-face encounters, and adaptive feedback mechanisms, the course fosters an environment that is both rigorous and responsive. This ensures that students develop not only technical competencies, but also critical soft skills, such as intercultural communication, teamwork, and systems thinking, that are essential for addressing today’s multifaceted urban challenges. In doing so, the course exemplifies the pedagogical potential of international collaboration in higher education, offering a model for how global learning can be both academically robust and socially relevant.